According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the average cost for electricity in Alaska can range anywhere between approximately 40% (residential) to 150% (industrial) more expensive than the average cost in the rest of the U.S. The high cost for electricity in Alaska demands that communities across the state utilize local energy resources as cost-efficiently as possible, or risk significant financial burden to community members. Alaskans spend an average of 4.3% of their household income on energy, compared to 2.7% in the Lower 48 states, with maximum energy burdens reaching over 50% for low-income renters (Boettger et al, April 2025). However, Alaska has diverse energy needs and resources, and what works well for one community may not in another. Similarly, what works well for one community member may not work well for other community members.
Due to the number of variables (cost, environmental factors, electricity rate, etc.) involved in energy decisions it can be challenging for communities in Alaska when assessing energy sources and future needs. For example, many small communites around Alaska depend on diesel generators due to their dispatchability. With ever-increasing fuel costs, communities may consider alternatives in energy production available to them. These could include projects involving solar, wind, and/or hydro power, depending on the potential of reliability of these energy resources, which varies accross the state. While these projects can lead to a reduction in cost for communities in the long run, projects can be expensive initially and thus prohibitive to community support.
For example, in 2014 the community of Sitka in Southeast Alaksa finished a $142 million hydroelectric project expanding a pre existing facility, however electricity usage unexpectedly decreased, causing a utility rate increase for community members (Kwong, 2016). However, this expansion allowed Sitka to eliminate the use of its diesel-fuel generator, therefore saving $3.3 million annually. Commonly, during projects like this, a community will engage in several meetings, where local citizens are able to discuss the pros and cons of the project and share any concerns or ideas.
It is important for communities to engage in respectful public forums that encourage equitable communication of the pros and cons of potential energy options available to them. In this lesson, students will be given a challenging scenario facing a fictional Alaska community, named “Unituq”. Each student will receive a role card to guide their participation in a community meeting. During the meeting students will participate through the lens of the community member represented by their role card, and will work cooperatively to select from one of several “energy grants” available for their community to apply to.